Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0361619930280010329
Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1993 Volume.28 No. 1 p.329 ~ p.343
Application of the Ilizarov method for Correction of Deformities in the Upper Extremities
ÀÌ´ö¿ë
ÃÖÀÎÈ£/Á¤Áø¿±/¹Ú°Ç¿µ/È«±âÁ¤/ÀÌ»óÇå
Abstract
In order to evaluate the factors causing complications and affecting the result. We reviewed 12 cases in which the deformities of upper extremities were corrected by the Ilizarov method at Seoul National University Hospital from October 1989 to
may
1991. The average age of patients was 10 years and 6 months(range, 4 years and 7 months-15 years and 7 months). The causes of length discrepancies and deformities were as follows ; post-traumatic physeal injuries 3, post-infectious physeal
injuries
3,
osteochondromas 2, congenital ulnar club hand 1, congenital radio-ulnar synostosis 1, brachial plexus injury 1, residual poliomyelits 1.
The goals of treatment were bone lengthening in 6 cases, bone lengthening and deformity correction in 4, bone lengthening and osteosynthesis in 1, and arthrodesis in 1.
@ES The results were summarized as follows;
@EN 1. Initial length discrepancy of upper extremity averaged 5.1cm (range, 1.5-8.3cm).
2. In humerus, average bone lengthening was 5.3cm (range, 4.0-7.0cm). percentage increase and healing index averaged 27% and 1.1mos/cm, respectively.
3. In radius, average bone lengthening was 2.8cm (range, 0.9-3.7cm), percentage increase and healing index averaged 18% and 2.5mos/cm, respectively.
4. In ulna, average bone lengthening was 3.3cm (range, 2.8-6.0cm), percentage increase and healing index axeraged 24% and 2.0month/cm, respectively.
5. In all of the cases, we could achieve the goals of lengthening. In case of shoulder arthrodesis, bony union was achieved at 4 months.
6. There were 7 cases of problems (58%), which were delayed consolidations 4, transient ulanr nerve palsy 1, limited range of motion of elbow 1, and pin tract inflammation 1, and there was 1 cases of obstacle (8%), which was ectopic ossification
at the
pin insertion site.
In conclusion, the Ilizarov method was useful for not only bone lengthening and deformity correction, but also arthrodesis with the advantage of postoperative readjustment of the segment. Precise application of Ilizarov method and proper
post-operative
management affect the results and are essential for prevention of complications.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø